In order for there to be any comparison at all, there must be some true or correct morality to compare them to. We could not say that Nazi morality is inherently worse than any other set of morals. He also distinguishes it from social convention, arguing that, if all morality were truly subjective, then there would be no sense in arguing that one morality is better or worse than the other. This Moral Law is not itself an instinct, but it helps us choose which of our instincts to act on. He distinguishes the Law of Human Nature, or Moral Law, from the herd instinct. Lewis points out that we all know how we ought to behave, and yet we constantly find ourselves doing the opposite. He calls our fundamental and universal understanding of fairness, or right and wrong, “The Law of Human Nature,” distinguishing it from other natural laws (such as gravity) by the fact that humans can choose whether or not to obey it. In Book I, Lewis explores the notion of right and wrong, which he argues is, at its core, an inherently human characteristic that is not, as some would argue, merely a social construct. Lewis argues for the existence of God, and then proceeds to outline what he believes are the fundamental tenants of Christianity. Written by people who wish to remain anonymous We are thankful for their contributions and encourage you to make your own. These notes were contributed by members of the GradeSaver community.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |